Back to roadmapBack to list

Autonomous docking and mooring

Autonomous docking and mooring support or automate a vessel’s final approach, berthing and securing at the quay.

AutomationInland shippingMarine shipping

Introduction

Autonomous docking and mooring support or automate a vessel’s final approach, berthing and securing at the quay. They can be used by both seagoing and inland vessels. Autonomous docking controls vessel movements, while automated mooring reduces or replaces manual line handling. Suitability depends on the vessel, berth and operating environment.

Value proposition

  • Improve safety

    By supporting precise movements near the quay

  • Reduce exposure to hazardous mooring lines

  • Potentially faster docking and mooring activities

These systems can improve safety by supporting precise movements near the quay and reducing exposure to hazardous mooring lines. They can also make frequent docking and mooring activities more consistent and potentially faster. Professional expertise remains necessary for supervision and exceptional situations. The business case depends on call frequency, compatibility and infrastructure costs.

Port applicability

Applicable to all ports, but the business case differs by application. Benefits may be highest at terminals with frequent and predictable vessel calls, or where automated systems can reduce hazardous mooring work. Labour benefits depend on whether the technology replaces or supports pilots, mooring personnel or inland vessel captains. Ports with controlled traffic, sufficient space and investment capacity are better suited to early implementation. Busy and complex ports may face higher costs because more data, software and hardware are required to operate safely.

Groups of innovations

  • Automated docking systems

    Vessel- based systems use sensors, positioning data and propulsion controls to support the final approach and alignment at the berth. A captain or pilot remains responsible and can intervene when needed. Timing: short to medium term. Pros: more precise and consistent manoeuvring. Cons: performance can be affected by wind, waves, currents and tides. Regulatory approval may also be required.

  • Automated mooring systems

    Quay- based systems use vacuum pads or other mechanical solutions to secure a compatible vessel with fewer or no conventional mooring lines. Timing: already available for selected vessels and berths. Pros: faster mooring and less exposure to tensioned lines. Cons: high infrastructure costs and limited compatibility between vessels and berths.

  • Smart or robotic line handling

    Remote- controlled or robotic equipment assists workers with conventional mooring lines. Human supervision remains necessary. Timing: short term. Pros: reduces manual handling and can be retrofitted more easily. Cons: does not remove all manual tasks or risks related to mooring lines.

  • Digital docking aids and integration

    These systems provide the captain or pilot with real-time information on vessel position, distance to the quay, approach speed and environmental conditions. Unlike automated docking, they support decision-making but do not directly control the vessel. Timing: short term. Pros: improves situational awareness and coordination. Cons: requires reliable sensors, data exchange and digital standards.

Impact

Impact level per aspect
ImpactLevelRemark
Port efficiencyMedium impact
Faster berthing, higher berth availability.
SafetyMedium impact
Improved safety: fewer human-related errors and reduced human exposure. Although increased risk of cyberthreats.
Level of automationLarge impact
Significant step towards automated port calls.
Human capitalMedium impact
Safer work, need for reskilling.
Digital port ecosystemLarge impact
Strong driver for digital integration.

Port characteristics

Implementation depends on quay design, vessel traffic, digital maturity and investment capacity. Berths used frequently by the same or similar vessels offer the best opportunities, as systems can be adapted to known vessel dimensions and operating profiles. Quays may require sufficient space, structural capacity, power and data connections. Sheltered berths with predictable wind, waves, currents and tides are generally more suitable than exposed locations. Adoption may be more difficult at multi-purpose berths with irregular traffic and widely varying vessel types. Ports should therefore assess vessel compatibility, call frequency, local conditions and quay readiness before investing.

Barriers and enablers

Enablers

  • TechnologyEnabler

    Proven automated mooring and docking support systems are already available. Continued development is improving their performance and range of applications.

  • DirectionalityEnabler

    Greater attention to safety and port automation supports further testing and adoption.

Barriers

  • Stakeholder interactionBarrier

    Pilots, mooring services and port workers must be involved early. Automation may face resistance if it is seen as a threat to jobs or professional responsibilities.

  • EconomicBarrier

    Automated systems require substantial investment. The business case is strongest at berths with frequent calls by compatible vessels.

  • Standards & regulationBarrier

    Liability must be agreed before implementation. Insurers, classification societies or authorities may restrict operations if responsibilities and risks are unclear.

How to implement?

  1. Step 1

    Identify suitable berths and use cases

  2. Step 2

    Run pilots and upgrade basic digital connectivity and monitoring

  3. Step 3

    Retrofit selected berths

  4. Step 4

    Develop procedures and train staff

  5. Step 5

    Expand to multiple berths and vessel types

  6. Step 6

    Integrate with fully autonomous vessels and port systems

Timeline

The arrow below represents the expected development of the TRL of autonomous docking and mooring.
* Technical Readiness Level

What should a port do in the next 3 years?

In the next three years, ports should focus on practical preparation for autonomous docking and mooring. This includes identifying suitable pilot berths, launching a small-scale pilot with an automated or smart mooring solution, and assessing quay and digital readiness for automated docking. Ports should upgrade basic connectivity and monitoring where needed, train staff and engage pilots and mooring services early, and update safety and emergency procedures to accommodate automated systems.

Investment overview

CAPEX Quay-based systems require investment in automated mooring equipment, quay adaptations, power supply, sensors and IT integration. These costs are mainly carried by ports or terminal operators. Ship-based docking systems require onboard sensors, control software and propulsion integration. These investments are mainly carried by shipowners. Both solutions may require additional connectivity and safety systems. OPEX Costs include maintenance, energy, software licences, monitoring and staff training. Automation can reduce incident costs and manual exposure. It also shifts work towards operational, supervisory and maintenance roles.

Stakeholder overview

Below is an overview of the required involved stakeholders. Port authorities coordinate spatial planning, safety requirements and permits, while terminal operators or concessionaires usually manage the berth and invest in quay-side systems. Shipowners define vessel requirements and confirm compatibility with the berth. Captains, pilots, mooring personnel and port workers should be involved in design, testing and operational procedures. Technology providers and engineering firms develop and integrate the docking and mooring systems. Classification societies, insurers and national authorities assess safety, liability and acceptance. For seagoing vessels, IMO provides the wider international regulatory framework. For inland vessels, relevant standards and requirements are developed mainly through CESNI, the EU and river commissions such as the CCNR. These organisations influence future requirements but are not normally involved in individual port projects
Blue stakeholders are essential, white stakeholders are enabling

Knowledge base